I'm entertained by the gameplay not the violence. I expect the developer to leverage the power of their other games to convince these companies to relax this AO-ban on their consoles in order for them to at least recoup some of the costs of making Manhunt II. I wish they would reconsider, because that's a kick in the balls after so much money, time, and effort has been sunk by developers to create this. If you're an adult you are responsible for your own actions and if you're aĭenying them the ability to release for the console is silly, though obviously within their rights. Either you're mature and mentally stable enough to deal with these games or you're not. The idea that extreme or sadistic violence is any more dangerous to the player than "clean" and gore-reduced mechanised killing seems absurd to me. What's the difference between a game that allows you to cut into someone's groin and one that allows you to shoot someone in the face? I don't see one. I'm sorry I see a complete absence of logic here. We're already on the road to that - people still have strong values concerning protection of children for example, but for how long? Already much of the public are allowing commercial forces to deliberately market sex fashion to lower and lower age groups. Let this go and what happens when something worse again is published? What about the time after that? Is it perfectly fine to allow society to go in a direction where such "freedom" is allowed? The ultimate end would be the destruction of society. In fact, it would probably better for them to allow people to buy this and keep tabs on people who are happy to be entertained by such violence. It is entirely sensible for a government to decide that it's not particularly good for society if some adults let alone kids play a computer game where they pretend to use "a saw blade to cut upward into a foe's groin and buttocks, motioning forward and backward with the Wii remote as you go". I'm certainly in favour of using censorship very sparingly indeed, but this seems to definitely be a game deserving of being the first computer game ever banned in my own country, Ireland. Most are bought by the ones that want to play them. I don't really think the majority of games sold these days are bought by parents. I'd rather see this move as one that might alienate the core buyer population. I know a fair lot of very dedicated console players, none of them having kids but they usually have the dough to buy about 2-3 games a month on average. The success of "party console games" like SSBM or Mario Party (or whatever the name was) suggest that, if nothing else. No kids, expendable income, party person. The average console freak ain't the 14 or 16 geeky, light-shunning hermit anymore, I'd rather think I'll find him in the 20-30 year old crowd.
Manhunt 2 ao ps3#
But a PS3 for 600 bucks with games costing in the 60 bucks range? If that's targeted at kids, how much allowance do they have today, and could I get adopted please?
![manhunt 2 ao manhunt 2 ao](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-C-8dXq8kKwU/U2ndOnkStwI/AAAAAAAAAT4/w1dDHkBrZsA/s1600/The-cover-of-Manhunt-2-rated-AO-video-games-18085958-800-1016.jpg)
![manhunt 2 ao manhunt 2 ao](https://www.myabandonware.com/media/screenshots/m/manhunt-2-lw5/manhunt-2_1.jpg)
Their motivation is not to police morality, but to ensure they don't alienate a large portion of the market.īut that's exactly what's going to happen.
![manhunt 2 ao manhunt 2 ao](https://steamunlocked.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/manhunt-2-free-download-screenshot.jpg)
Console makers do the whole "sales protection" thing regarding what games are released.